From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Robust shell-based test for DJGPP?
Date:	Tue, 2 Jan 2001 21:27:40 +0100
Message-ID:	<NEBBIOJNGMKPNOBKHCGHAEEECAAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To:	<8296-Tue02Jan2001211417+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance:	Normal
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id PAA12600
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> No, there are complex configure scripts, with several scripts in
> subdirectories, where this causes more breakage.
Could you give a specific example? The more outlandish and/or complex
configure.in's I have, the better I can test my patches.

> Ah, you are talking about the configure script distributed with
> Emacs.  It isn't used for the DJGPP build at all, so you don't need to
> bother about it too much.
I've used it to configure emacs without problems for a few versions now,
so there's no need for me not to try out my patched autoconf on it :-)
In fact, if I hadn't, I wouldn't have run into the srcdir issue, as I
usually use relative paths as --srcdir.

- Raw text -