delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200101021646.RAA28521@father.ludd.luth.se> |
Subject: | Re: FAT32's extend flag remove for OS/2 |
In-Reply-To: | <7458-Tue02Jan2001183133+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from Eli Zaretskii at "Jan 2, 2001 06:31:33 pm" |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Tue, 2 Jan 2001 17:46:29 +0100 (MET) |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Eli Zaretskii: > > Why are we calling _get_dos_version(0) in _creat_n.c and not > > _get_dos_version(1)? > > I don't know; I didn't write that code ;-). > > In general, you can use _get_dos_version(0) when you don't care if > some software, such as SETVER, lies to you about the DOS version. > > Also note that if _get_dos_version(0) is good enough, you can simply > use _osmajor and _osminor. Isn't it better to use _get_dos_version(1) in the case in question, then? Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |