From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200101011843.TAA23735@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: DOZE and WINDOZE versions
In-Reply-To:	<1659-Mon01Jan2001203454+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from Eli Zaretskii at "Jan 1, 2001 08:34:54 pm"
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date:	Mon, 1 Jan 2001 19:43:44 +0100 (MET)
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP-WORKERS)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> > From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> > Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 19:09:43 +0100 (MET)
> > 
> > According to Eli Zaretskii:
> > > > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> > > > Then we could have a completely DJGPP-hosted build environment.
> > > 
> > > You lost me.  How does this pertain to NT versonities?
> > 
> > I think he means: if we had this cross-compiler we could build this
> > WINDOZE program/extension/whatever in DOZE.
> 
> ??? If you use MinGW to produce a DJGPP program, that program cannot
> access any Windows-specific API, exactly like a natively-compiled
> DJGPP program.  Am I missing something?

Yes. You're going the wrong way. We'll use DJGPP to produce a MinGW
program, I think.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -