delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200012311446.PAA18462@father.ludd.luth.se> |
Subject: | Re: DOZE and WINDOZE versions |
In-Reply-To: | <9003-Sun31Dec2000100508+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from Eli Zaretskii at "Dec 31, 2000 10:05:09 am" |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:46:04 +0100 (MET) |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Eli Zaretskii: > I thought Windows 98 was supposed to report 7.20, at least in some of > its releases, no? We have a couple of functions, like _rename and > mkdir, which depend on that: they call special functions of Int 21h > that support path names up to 128 characters. Perhaps that is the SECOND EDITION? > Also, if you have access to Windows ME, could you see what goes wrong > with _rename on that OS? We had in the past a few reports about > linking which fails with EINVAL due to that. I've tried running "mv a b" with success. Doesn't mv use rename()? Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |