Message-ID:	<3A4CE287.E4B0DAED@softhome.net>
Date:	Fri, 29 Dec 2000 20:14:15 +0100
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Ribust shell-based test for DJGPP?
References:	<NEBBIOJNGMKPNOBKHCGHIECECAAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Tim Van Holder wrote:
[explanation snipped...]

OK, now I see.

> As for Martin's suggestion to use $DJGPP, that would probably be more robust
> indeed, as users are free to rename djgpp.env provided $DJGPP points to the
> right file.

Hmm. I think even following could be used:
if test -d /dev/c; then
  # Here we are...
fi

But it won't work on systems without C: drive, of course.

> Since config.guess uses it, I suppose I could indeed also use 'uname', testing for
> 'pc' as machine and 'MS-DOS' as OS. 

But it introduces sometimes redudant dependency on shellutils. Simple configures
can do without it - now they will not be able.

Laurynas

- Raw text -