Message-Id:	<5.0.2.1.0.20001227141202.025ac6b0@pop5.banet.net>
X-Sender:	usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date:	Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:17:36 -0500
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
From:	"Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
Subject:	Re: llseek is not in stubs.h (was: Re: Locking fcntl changes
	#2)
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1001227100813.8380Q-100000@is>
References:	<5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20001227015917 DOT 00a83050 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

At 10:11 AM 12/27/00 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
<Snipped>
 >If you call llseek inside fcntl, then you indeed need to add it to
 >stubs.h.
 >
 >Note that you don't need to change the name of llseek in llseek.c (or 

 >whatever its source is called): just #include <libc/stubs.h> in it, 
and
 >it will do it for you.  Including stubs.h is the only thing you need 
to
 >do on the source level.

Let me understand this correctly -- just include <libc/stubs.h> in 
fcntl.c (where it is used) and the make process will automatically add 
it to a newly created version of libc/stubs.h, is that right?  Or is it 
llseek.c that needs the include for <libc/stubs.h>?

I'm confused because *both* fcntl.c and llseek.c currently include 
<libc/stubs.h>, and llseek has *not* been generated into stubs.h in the 
many makes I have run.



---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR
                      pjfarley AT banet DOT net)

- Raw text -