delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be> |
To: | <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: diff -u |
Date: | Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:25:32 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <NEBBIOJNGMKPNOBKHCGHGEBICAAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) |
In-reply-to: | <200012271600.RAA00710@father.ludd.luth.se> |
Importance: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id LAA13651 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Is it possible to change the recommendation when generating patches to > "use -u"? The -c diffs is very hard for me (humans?) to decypher. This seems to be purely a personal preference. I for one find context diffs easier to read than unified ones. But then again, I'm not human :-P Generally speaking, I'm happy as long as it isn't the useless standard format.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |