From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: An implementation of /dev/zero for DJGPP
Date:	Mon, 25 Dec 2000 16:25:46 +0100
Message-ID:	<NEBBIOJNGMKPNOBKHCGHMEANCAAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1001225130436.19455A-100000@is>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance:	Normal
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id KAA01083
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > extern int _djgpp_fsext_devices;
> > int _djgpp_fsext_devices = __FSEXT_DEV_ZERO | __FSEXT_DEV_RANDOM;
> 
> This will always link in the /dev/zero support.  We are trying to avoid 
> bloating each program with code and data it will never use.
My mistake - had overlooked the fact that the call to
__FSEXT_add_open_handler() would pull in the rest of the functions as
well. Suggestion withdrawn.

- Raw text -