Date:	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 14:59:40 +0200 (WET)
From:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc-2.95.* for DJGPP
In-Reply-To:	<3A3CBD66.D3C8FDC@softhome.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.A41.4.05.10012171454040.39012-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> Andris Pavenis wrote:
> > 
> > Yesterday tried to build gcc-2.95.3 (current CVS version) for DJGPP.
> > With some hacking I got it through. Java and Chill related
> > parts were removed without much thinking:
> 
> It might be possible that Objective C (its runtime lib) is broken too.

Verified: gcc-2.95.2.1 builds nicely under Linux on the same box where I
got problems with 2.95.3. Now left the same test for 2.95.3 once more
with the same script (modified script from Slackware sources). Let's see.
(there is not too big problems to do that on computer in Riga, when I'm
sitting near Helsinki ...). Anyway no serious debugging before I'll return
to Latvia

> 
> > The problems I got was linked with libio. For a rather long time
> > (before switching to libstdc++-v3) 
> 
> You're using GCC 2.97 for DJGPP with libstdc++-v3? Did you see any problems?
> 

No. My last test for DJGPP was before switching to libstdc++-v3. The box
in Riga is bootstrapping and running tests for current CVS version of
gcc-2.97 for Linux only

Andris

- Raw text -