delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:10:00 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Why are we using offset_t and not off64_t? |
In-Reply-To: | <200012101238.NAA13879@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001210170823.3634C-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Martin Stromberg wrote: > Hmm, perhaps somebody could try creating file bigger than 2^32 on a > NTFS file system. Who says NTFS supports files larger than 2^32 natively? Does it? > I guess you can't through DOZE/DJGPP. Most definitelyly. The DOS calls simply don't have enough bits in the registers to pass larger offsets.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |