From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	CVS port
Date:	Sat, 9 Dec 2000 19:44:44 +0100
Message-ID:	<NBBBIOJKJBNCHJBEKHLOIEEBCCAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id NAA20346
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli objected to me dropping support for DOS-style CVSROOTs (my current
cvs 1.11 port requires a /dev/-style CVSROOT), so I'll be adding that
back in.
Now what I wanted to know is whether it is acceptable to base a DJGPP
package on development sources (i.e. on the latest CVS-based tree),
or whether they should always be based on an official release. Also,
is it acceptable to merge in unofficial patches (such as the
'edit -c' patch that is used by CVSNT)?
My guess is that it is probably ok, as long as it is tested and has
been proven stable, but if anyone has moral objections, feel free to
set me straight.

- Raw text -