delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be> |
To: | <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: DJGPP linker script update |
Date: | Thu, 7 Dec 2000 18:38:17 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <NBBBIOJKJBNCHJBEKHLOAEDGCCAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012071653470.18292-100000@acp3bf> |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
Importance: | Normal |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id MAA07422 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> > 2. If the latter, do we have a volunteer to add core file support at > > least for GNU/Linux? ;-) > > That would probably be a reinvention of a wheel that already exists inside > either BFD or GDB. I don't think so. If core files are accessed through bfd, adding reading of core files to bfdsymify would be fairly trivial. Creating a stack backtrace from the core file might be slightly less trivial. Of course, I admit I no far too little about the internals of \(bfd\|gdb\|\(bfd\)?symify\) to speak with any kind of authority on the matter.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |