delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sat, 02 Dec 2000 18:56:39 +0200 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net> |
Message-Id: | <4634-Sat02Dec2000185639+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <3A290D90.C424D8F4@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis |
on Sat, 02 Dec 2000 15:56:16 +0100) | |
Subject: | Re: Patch: make GCC & DJGPP headers compatible |
References: | <3A290D90 DOT C424D8F4 AT softhome DOT net> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 15:56:16 +0100 > From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net> > > The major obstacle about header compatibility has vanished - we > can be sure that GCC headers define size_t etc. in the right way. What/who exactly made this miracle possible? > +#ifndef _SIZE_T > __DJ_size_t > -#undef __DJ_size_t > -#define __DJ_size_t > +#define _SIZE_T > +#endif Could you please repeat, for this old man's sake, what do these _SIZE_T symbols do?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |