Message-Id:	<4.3.1.0.20001026202712.00b0f5d0@pop5.banet.net>
X-Sender:	usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Thu, 26 Oct 2000 20:33:26 -0400
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
From:	"Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Bash 2.04 beta 6a
Cc:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<39F77243.19193.27836A@localhost>
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20001025221409 DOT 00ad89b0 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
	<39F4D6CB DOT 20960 DOT 364B6C AT localhost>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

At 11:52 PM 10/25/00 -0400, Mark E. wrote:
<Snipped>
 >I think so. The Bash manual says this about comments:
 >
 >   In a non-interactive shell, or an interactive shell in which the
 >`interactive_comments' option to the `shopt' builtin is enabled 
(*note
 >Bash Builtins::.), a word beginning with `#' causes that word and all
 >remaining characters on that line to be ignored.  An interactive 
shell
 >without the `interactive_comments' option enabled does not allow
 >comments.  The `interactive_comments' option is on by default in
 >interactive shells.  *Note Is This Shell Interactive?::, for a
 >description of what makes a shell interactive.

What mode (interactive or non-interactive) is DJGPP bash in when 
invoked by system()?  Does bash even know it has been invoked that 
way?  Does it depend on whether the user started out in bash or in 
COMMAND.COM?

I'm going to try the original perl test starting from a bash prompt, 
and see if that makes a difference.  I'll keep you posted.

Peter
---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR
                      pjfarley AT banet DOT net)

- Raw text -