delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:28:27 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <200009292328.TAA17270@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <200009292321.BAA25136@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin |
Str|mberg on Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:21:42 +0200 (MET DST)) | |
Subject: | Re: djasm and Y2K... |
References: | <200009292321 DOT BAA25136 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> So are you saying that CVS/RCS won't object? (I'm not sure how to > verify that, you see.) I assume we're still talking about the ids djasm puts in the programs. These aren't strings that cvs reads or generates; at best ident will print them to the screen. I don't understand why cvs would object to them.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |