From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200009292321.BAA25136@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: djasm and Y2K...
In-Reply-To:	<200009292304.TAA17038@envy.delorie.com> from DJ Delorie at "Sep 29, 2000 07:04:23 pm"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 30 Sep 2000 01:21:42 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to DJ Delorie:
> 
> > Shall we go to four digits or subract 100?
> > 
> > While we are talking about this piece: could we change the MM/DD/YY
> > format to YY/MM/DD or YY-MM-DD which every sane person should use
> > (hello Americans...)?
> 
> If we're changing it anyway, I'd prefer changing to YYYY-MM-DD.  Any
> other format is potentially confusing, but having the year first
> implies sort-order, meaning month would logically be next.

So are you saying that CVS/RCS won't object? (I'm not sure how to
verify that, you see.)


Left Hand Solution, Fevered,

						MartinS

- Raw text -