| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
| Message-Id: | <200009291643.SAA23857@father.ludd.luth.se> |
| Subject: | Re: (fwd) startup-code |
| In-Reply-To: | <9003-Fri29Sep2000102429+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from Eli Zaretskii at "Sep 29, 2000 10:24:29 am" |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Sep 2000 18:43:58 +0200 (MET DST) |
| X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Eli Zaretskii:
> Martin, I think you can commit this, and then we'll let time tell if
> it's okay ;-)
Ok. Is this ok as wc204.txi entry:
"@cindex lib/djgpp DOT djl AT r{, polluting the namespace unnecessarily}
The linker script @code{lib/djgpp.djl} corrected to not unnecessarily
pollute the name space with the symbols @code{etext}, @code{edata} and
@code{end}."
Right,
MartinS
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |