From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200009181709.TAA25929@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: O_APPEND
In-Reply-To:	<39C62F51.678BEA69@softhome.net> from Laurynas Biveinis at "Sep 18, 2000 05:05:53 pm"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 18 Sep 2000 19:09:01 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Laurynas Biveinis:
> > I don't understand this so I don't know if O_APPEND should go beside
> > O_BINARY and O_TEXT or not.
> 
> Is there any reason it shouldn't?

But why the exclusive or? Of course I could just throw it in there and
hope for the best, but I'd prefer to understand the code I change.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -