delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2000 11:07:54 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <200009141507.LAA04685@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <200009140446.GAA28575@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin |
Stromberg on Thu, 14 Sep 2000 06:46:39 +0200 (MET DST)) | |
Subject: | Re: (fwd) startup-code |
References: | <200009140446 DOT GAA28575 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> So the use in dpmiexcp.c is correct? Wouldn't it be better if the > symbol was named "_end" or "__end"? Is it possible to change? The existence of both end and _end is historical and typical of older unix platforms.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |