Date:	Mon, 4 Sep 2000 16:16:16 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: EXE header in DJGPP programs
In-Reply-To:	<200009041026.MAA03469@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000904161453.6738D-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> If that is the case, it's amazing that we aren't violating contents of
> other fields in the header.

All the other fields are before the stub blurb.

- Raw text -