Message-ID:	<39A43717.9EF83306@softhome.net>
Date:	Wed, 23 Aug 2000 22:41:59 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Symlinks are done!
References:	<39A2E301 DOT 29AD624C AT softhome DOT net> <2110-Wed23Aug2000142755+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <39A3D5DF DOT F9F3B78F AT softhome DOT net> <1438-Wed23Aug2000173005+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Does the same apply to glob()?
> 
> Yes, since `glob' uses findfirst/findnext.

What's worse, does the same apply to readlink()? If yes,
I'm in trouble - __solve_symlinks() will need the fourth 
major rewrite from the scratch (ugh), otherwise it will
solve the same things over and over again (not infinitely, 
though)

Laurynas

- Raw text -