Date:	Sat, 19 Aug 2000 12:02:43 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	lauras AT softhome DOT net
Message-Id:	<9003-Sat19Aug2000120243+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<399D81BD.2DD855CA@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis
	on Fri, 18 Aug 2000 20:34:37 +0200)
Subject:	Re: Patch: fstat()
References:	<399D81BD DOT 2DD855CA AT softhome DOT net>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 20:34:37 +0200
> From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> 
> I'm not sure how wc204.txi entry should look for it, or 
> is it required at all, because we will end up with a
> looong list of function which support symlinks now.

Hmm...  We do need to tell somewhere what functions support symlinks,
though.  It doesn't have to be in wc204.txi; you can simply say that
all file-related Posix functions do that, and give a few examples.

As for the real list, it should probably be in the `symlink's .txh
file.  What worries me about this is that the list is crafted by hand,
so it can easily become outdated as the library is developed.

It would be nice to have some automated procedure that would grep the
sources for calls to __internal_readlink and generate a file which
symlink.txh could @include.

However, maybe it's too much for now: the list is not so long, I
think.

- Raw text -