Message-ID:	<399A922F.2458DE9B@softhome.net>
Date:	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:07:59 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Patch: open() adjustment for symlinks
References:	<200008161238 DOT OAA09506 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Martin Stromberg wrote:
> As a matter of fact I _can_ envision a possible use for a symlink
> FSEXT hook: suppose someone want to be able to handle umsdos
> extensions on FAT?

I think that hook for readlink() is reasonable in this case (__solve_symlinks()
uses just readlink() anyway.). Maybe hook for symlink() is required here
too? If nobody objects, I implement them.

Laurynas

- Raw text -