From:	"Juan Manuel Guerrero" <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
Organization:	Darmstadt University of Technology
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
Date:	Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:21:01 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: small patch for unzip32
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54DE)
Message-ID:	<C7668A258B5@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:10:26 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
> > Comments, suggestions, etc are welcome before a send a similar patch
> > to the InfoZip maintainers.
>
> About this change:
>
> > + #   ifndef __DJGPP__
> > +      /*
> > +         This is DJGPP specific:
> > +         TZ is usualy not defined in the AUTOEXEC.BAT of an average user.
> > +         Issueing continuously this warning may confuse most of the newbies.
> > +         All this means:
> > +         check for TZ, use it if available but do not complain if not available.
> > +      */
> >               Info(slide, 0x401, ((char *)slide, LoadFarString(WarnInvalidTZ)));
> > + #   endif
>
> I agree that it is a good idea to disable the warning for unzip32.exe
> that is uploaded to SimTel.NET, but I don't think you should send this
> change to the UnZip maintainers.  In general, the warning that's
> printed here is a valuable one, and should IMHO be kept.

Yes, I agree. Please note, the patch I have submitted is **not** the patch
I will submit to the InfoZip maintainers. The patch I send is for information
of the djgpp workers and that is the one I will use to replace the unzip32.exe
at SimTel.NET. That was the reason why I wrote I would send a **similar** but
not the same patch to InfoZip maintainers. Of course, the above change is 100%
DJGPP specific and will **not** be submitted to the maintainers. Netherless,
thanks for the advise.

Regards,
Guerrero, Juan Manuel

- Raw text -