Message-ID:	<39982526.BD15241A@softhome.net>
Date:	Mon, 14 Aug 2000 18:58:14 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: <limits.h> change for symlinks
References:	<3997BA55 DOT 413E8CCD AT softhome DOT net> <2950-Mon14Aug2000192605+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Are these relevant to symlinks?  I thought they are only related to
> hard links.  Where does the link count come into play with symlinks?

I'm confused. I've been using those to determine when continue solving
symlinks and when to quit. I'm afraid it is the same story as with EMLINK,
which I was using to throw on link loop.

So if they are for hard links, I will drop this patch. But where should 
be specified maximum symlink count when resolving path? Could it be even
hardcoded?

I think some rest won't hurt after I have integrated symlinks.

Laurynas

- Raw text -