X-Authentication-Warning:	ixi.eng.ascend.com: meyering set sender to meyering AT ascend DOT com using -f
Sender:	meyering AT ascend DOT com
To:	Paul Eggert <eggert AT twinsun DOT com>
Cc:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il, tr AT eth DOT net, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
	autoconf AT gnu DOT org
Subject:	Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}?
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0007250651010 DOT 823-100000 AT midpec DOT com>
	<200008110941 DOT CAA29407 AT drawbridge DOT ascend DOT com>
	<uryem3w86ib DOT fsf AT ixi DOT eng DOT ascend DOT com>
	<200008111728 DOT KAA12810 AT drawbridge DOT ascend DOT com>
	<urysnsb4qia DOT fsf_-_ AT ixi DOT eng DOT ascend DOT com>
	<200008111956 DOT MAA12359 AT ruby DOT twinsun DOT com>
From:	Jim Meyering <meyering AT ascend DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	Paul Eggert's message of "Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:56:20 -0700 (PDT)"
Date:	12 Aug 2000 09:47:59 +0200
Message-ID:	<uryzomi3opc.fsf@ixi.eng.ascend.com>
Lines:	14
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.6.92
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Paul Eggert <eggert AT twinsun DOT com> writes:
|    From: Jim Meyering <meyering AT ascend DOT com>
|    Date: 11 Aug 2000 20:11:25 +0200
|
|    I saw the earlier thread (on the autoconf list) on this topic where
|    someone found that `?' and \| were not portable.  Has anyone found a
|    system on which \{m,n\} is not portable?
|
| Most likely, seds that don't support ? and \| also don't support
| \{m,n\}, as I recall that those features were introduced to USG Unix
| at about the same time.  Unix Version 7 didn't have them.

Thanks, but if no one can point to an actual system for which
sed's \{m,n\} doesn't work, I'm going to document it as portable.

- Raw text -