delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200008111619.SAA08167@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> |
Subject: | Re: Patch: symlink() |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Fri, 11 Aug 2000 18:19:14 +0200 (MET DST) |
In-Reply-To: | <39941478.329CA50B@softhome.net> from "Laurynas Biveinis" at Aug 11, 2000 04:58:00 PM |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.5 PL3] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> +@findex symlink AT r{, and symlink support} > +As a part of symlink emulation, @code{symlink} no longer emulates symlinks > +to executables by creating stubs. It creates symlinks to all files instead. Was this agreed upon? I'd think the DJGPP stub .EXE symlink support could still be very useful. Otherwise we won't be able to launch symlink .EXEs from COMMAND.COM. Am I missing something? Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |