X-Authentication-Warning:	sirppi.helsinki.fi: peuha owned process doing -bs
Date:	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:32:44 +0300 (EET DST)
From:	Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Sender:	peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: DJGPP build process
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000803141959.12419C-100000@is>
Message-ID:	<Pine.OSF.4.20.0008041109130.30959-100000@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> I'm not sure I understand you: did you want to build the docs alone, 
> without the rest?

Yes.

> If you indeed want the docs alone, wouldn't it be easier to have a simple 
> shell script or a special makefile target just for that?

Probably, but I would also like that running make in the src directory
(with the -k switch) will build everything it possibly can.  Currently
it doesn't.

> Why not?  Assuming you don't violate any of the requirements for the
> library build process (no extra tools except Make and Texinfo), that
> is.

I just want to reorganize the makefiles.

> If you only want the docs, why would you need stubify?

I don't, but the make process wanted to run it. :-)

Anyway, the problem I discovered in stubify exists on DOS as well.
Assuming there's no empty.exe in the current directory, running
these commands

touch empty.exe
stubify empty.exe
stubify empty.exe

will freeze the machine.  My patch prevents that.

-- 
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/

- Raw text -