Date:	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:13:20 -0400
Message-Id:	<200007242113.RAA20724@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<200007242110.XAA06567@mailgw3.netvision.net.il>
	(eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il)
Subject:	Re: Better GCC news
References:	<397CA24B DOT 7788CBB0 AT softhome DOT net> <200007242110 DOT XAA06567 AT mailgw3 DOT netvision DOT net DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> And what exactly do we gain from this procedure, assuming The Powers
> That Be approve the nominee?

A DJGPP GCC maintainer would be able to check changes to
djgpp-specific files into the gcc CVS repository without needing to
get authorization from anyone else.

- Raw text -