delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <200007242110.XAA06567@mailgw3.netvision.net.il> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Jul 2000 00:10:25 +0200 |
To: | Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net> |
X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <397CA24B.7788CBB0@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis |
on Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:08:43 +0200) | |
Subject: | Re: Better GCC news |
References: | <397CA24B DOT 7788CBB0 AT softhome DOT net> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:08:43 +0200 > From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net> > > Gerald Pfeifer, member of GCC Steering Comittee, contacted me and > offered us to find a dedicated DJGPP port maintainer for GCC. If we > find one, its nomination will be discussed in Steering Comittee. And what exactly do we gain from this procedure, assuming The Powers That Be approve the nominee?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |