Message-ID:	<39744678.C74248FE@softhome.net>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 13:58:48 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: GCC headers and DJGPP port
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000718141739 DOT 2467C-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Yes, I saw that explanation, but I don't really know what target.h is ;-).

djgpp.h to be precise.

> Putting the same definitions as used by DJGPP in target.h is semi-okay:
> we need to be sure that these definitions won't change too often,
> otherwise we create incompatibility between GCC and the library.

If we put something to djgpp.h, the only people who would change something
here are DJGPP port maintainers. IMHO this ensures that definitions won't
change too often.

> I understand that __need_size_t etc. are tested inside stddef.h, yes?

Yes.

> Are we sure these ifdef's inside stddef.h will stay?

Of course we can't be sure, although I don't see any reasons why should they.

Laurynas

- Raw text -