Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2000/07/18/07:57:19
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I want to see this thing solved, although not necesarry in politically correct
> > way.
>
> Me too, believe me. But if the best solution that GCC maintainers would
> have means more work for us and more FAQs than we can handle, perhaps the
> ``dirty'' solution of removing the headers GCC wants to use is the
> easiest way out.
I agree. But what if some GCC features will stop working if they expect
particular builtins in headers?
> > It is interesting why only DJGPP and *BSD have faced this kind of
> > problems so far, and all other ports which play by GCC rules keep quiet.
>
> What other platforms?
I mean almost _all_ other platforms. grep shows few ports which do
not install GCC header files. But they're unmaintained.
Laurynas
- Raw text -