delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <200007140900.MAA05402@mailgw1.netvision.net.il> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:00:17 +0200 |
To: | ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se |
X-Mailer: | Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <200007131715.TAA29824@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin |
Str|mberg on Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:15:20 +0200 (MET DST)) | |
Subject: | Re: Making entries in the function index of libc.tex |
References: | <200007131715 DOT TAA29824 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> > Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:15:20 +0200 (MET DST) > > > @node rand48 family, random number > > > > I'm assuming that people are likely to look for "rand48" most of the > > time. > > That is exactly the problem, non-UNIX people probably don't know to > look at rand48! If you really want to make this transparent, there's no other way but to create a separate node for each function. Given that you already have all the info written up, it's a simple cut-n-paste exercise.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |