delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Sender: | rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk |
Message-ID: | <395DB7FA.56B0ABB3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> |
Date: | Sat, 01 Jul 2000 10:20:58 +0100 |
From: | Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) |
X-Accept-Language: | de,fr |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | Confusing portability statements in libc reference? |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Hello. Yesterday I looked at this info page: info libc alpha sigaction The portability is shown as: not ANSI, POSIX My first thought was that this was neither ANSI nor POSIX, but it is POSIX. This could be confusing. I think that the portability info produced should be either: 1. sorted to group all nots onto one line & all "yes" cases on another line; 2. split across multiple lines (one case/lines); 3. separated by semi-colons. Could anyone else be confused by this, or is it just me? ;) Bye, -- Richard Dawe [ mailto:richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com | http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ ]
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |