delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:26:42 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Patch: chown() preparation for symlinks |
In-Reply-To: | <39570457.244EB194@softhome.net> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000626112524.6395D-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote: > Or maybe it is better to optimize access() for F_OK case? We can't, unless I'm missing something. AFAIK, all the added complexity *is* for the F_OK case.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |