Message-ID:	<394B71EC.ED924E8B@softhome.net>
Date:	Sat, 17 Jun 2000 14:41:16 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Patch: sentinels for typedefs in headers
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10006161530230 DOT 8899-100000 AT acp3bf>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> 
> > OK to install?
> 
> There's not really any need to change the WEOF definition. It can just as
> well stay as it is: (wint_t) -1 is the same as (wint_t) 0xffffffff,
> anyway, but the first version is more 'expressive', IMHO.

Yup, both are the one and the same, but I've replaced -1 with 0xffffffff
because if somebody looks at (wint_t)-1, it does not suggest that WEOF
is actually unsigned now. However that's a very minor difference.

Laurynas

- Raw text -