X-Authentication-Warning:	acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de: broeker owned process doing -bs
Date:	Wed, 7 Jun 2000 11:54:05 +0200 (MET DST)
From:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
X-Sender:	broeker AT acp3bf
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
cc:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject:	Re: EMLINK / ELOOP ?
In-Reply-To:	<393D2B44.38FA3A52@softhome.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10006071152080.2373-100000@acp3bf>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > EMLINK -- Too many links.  Not used in DJGPP (as DOS doesn't support
> > > links).
[...]
> > I wonder if all that complexity is really needed just to tell that
> > EMLINK can never happen in DJGPP...
> 
> OK, but maybe just changing "Doesn't support links" to "Doesn't support
> hard links" would clarify it without increasing pedanticism?

Well, DOS doesn't support symlinks, either. DJGPP has pseudo-symlinks for
executables, and Windows has pseudo-symlinks as the Desktop 'shortcuts',
but neither of those is supported by DOS. So IMHO there's nothing wrong
about the sentence 'DOS doesn't support links'.

Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.

- Raw text -