From:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 31 May 2000 13:06:06 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: __dosexec_find_on_path question
Message-ID:	<39350E3E.8018.287111@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<200005311650.TAA17554@alpha.netvision.net.il>
References:	<3934E7C8 DOT 26244 DOT 7A952 AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com)
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
> > Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 10:22:00 -0400
> >
> > Does the same thing need to be done to __dosexec_find_on_path?
> 
> Sorry, I didn't understand this question.  We *are* talking about
> __dosexec_find_on_path, aren't we?
> 

Actually, my patch is for __spawnve. __dosexec_find_on_path doesn't need to 
be patched if it's an internal libc function. I assume it's meant to be 
internal-only because it's not documented in libc.info.

Mark

- Raw text -