delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Tue, 23 May 2000 14:42:44 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Pierre Muller <muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Simple C program showing FPU problem ! |
In-Reply-To: | <200005231133.NAA06460@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000523144100.5702A-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Pierre Muller wrote: > >Shouldn't we access the I/O port *before* clearing the exceptions, like > >Intel says? > > Maybe, I did not try the other way around ! One more question: how does your change affect the situation when one DJGPP program runs another, and the child program triggers an FP exception? Does the parent still get the exception instead of the child, or does something change?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |