Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2000/05/15/11:43:10
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Mark E. wrote:
> > Is there any reason not to ask GCC maintainers to do that in float.h as
> > well?
> >
>
> I did some checking in the sources, and generation of float.h for a system
> can easily be disabled. Whether they accept such a patch given their attitude
> is another matter.
FWIW, I don't even understand why float.h is on the list of affected
headers. I can imagine why stdarg.h would, but why float.h?
If the reason(s) are grave, I can understand why they won't agree. But
then disabling the header won't solve the problem anyway...
- Raw text -