| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Message-Id: | <200005151033.GAA28759@delorie.com> |
| From: | "Dieter Buerssner" <buers AT gmx DOT de> |
| To: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 May 2000 13:42:38 +0200 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Subject: | Re: Math functions |
| CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| References: | <200005141214 DOT PAA00841 AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000515103857.9209D-100000@is> |
| X-mailer: | Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b) |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
On 15 May 00, at 10:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Looks pretty impressive. Thanks. > But I understand that this doesn't include > argument reduction in all cases, does it? All trig functions with arguments outside [-pi/4,pi/4] need argument reduction. Similar for all exp like functions. Hyperbolic functions don't need argument reduction directly, they rather depend on correct exp and expm1.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |