Date:	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 16:09:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id:	<200004262009.QAA24166@indy.delorie.com>
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
To:	salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De
In-reply-to:	<3906E709.AEB2C08E@inti.gov.ar> (message from salvador on Wed, 26
	Apr 2000 09:54:33 -0300)
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU Gettext 0.10.35
References:	<1FCF05F5782 AT HRZ1 DOT hrz DOT tu-darmstadt DOT de> <200004261059 DOT GAA23630 AT indy DOT delorie DOT com> <3906E709 DOT AEB2C08E AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:54:33 -0300
> From: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
> 
> > The right solution would be to modify gettext.m4 test so that it fails
> > for DJGPP's own gettext.  The easiest way to do that is to include
> > conio.h; I expect this to cause GCC to fail the compilation due to
> > different prototypes.  (To be portable, this test will have to be
> > preceded by an additional one, that checks whether conio.h is
> > available.)
> 
> Or a conditional in the C test code?

Yes, a conditional on __DJGPP__ would also work.

> >  I would suggest to submit such a change to gettext
> > maintainer.
> >
> > However, the gettext maintainer does not have any sympathies for the
> > DJGPP project, to say the least, so I'm not holding my breath for the
> > inclusion of such a change.
> 
> Is he Ulrich?

Ulrich Drepper, yes.

- Raw text -