Date:	Tue, 4 Apr 2000 14:29:34 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gdb-20000402
In-Reply-To:	<38E9EFEE.31318.5568E8@localhost>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000404142428.9459S-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 4 Apr 2000 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> however I haven't seriously tested yet. Poblems were with 
> 	make info
> Makefile in gdb/docs explicitly uses 'ln -s' and 'ln' which causes
> 'make gdb-cfg.texi' in that directory to generate gdb-cfg.texi.exe 
> instead. As the result 'make info' fails.

Yes, this is a known problem, I intend to fix it in the following days.
(I was surprised you didn't mention it before, and assumed that you 
simply didn't say "make info".  For some weird reason, GDB doesn't build 
the Info files when you say "make"; when I mentioned that on the GDB 
mailing list, nobody seemed to care...)

> PS. I used my earlier script for configuring gdb which  I used before 
> for gdb-4.18

I would prefer that people use the scripts that come with the 
distribution (there's a file gdb/config/djgpp/README that describes how 
to unpack and build).  This is one of the main goals of my work on GDB 
5.0, and it's best to have it tested as much as possible before the 
release.  Thanks in advance.

- Raw text -