From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200004021758.TAA26704@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: restrict
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000402085639.8988O-100000@is> from Eli Zaretskii at "Apr 2, 2000 08:57:45 am"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 2 Apr 2000 19:58:17 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> However, I'm not even sure it's a good idea to have those `restrict'
> keywords in the headers, or to compile the library with them being
> visible to the compiler: it might introduce bugs or unexpected
> misfeatures into user programs.  All we gain in return is some code
> efficiency.  Comments?

Can we leave them out and still be standard compliant?


Right,

							MartinS

- Raw text -