delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 26 Mar 2000 01:12:00 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <200003260612.BAA29293@mescaline.gnu.org> |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <200003241507.QAA28898@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin |
Stromberg on Fri, 24 Mar 2000 16:07:01 +0100 (MET)) | |
Subject: | Re: restrict |
References: | <200003241507 DOT QAA28898 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | dj-admin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
How should we handle the new keyword restrict, until GCC supports it? I imagine you checked this, but I'm surprised: I thought GCC 2.95.x already supported `restrict'. Perhaps it's a good idea to ask on gnu.gcc.bug. (The C99 standard sprinkles them everywhere in the headers, even in old headers.) "#define restrict" somewhere strategically? The GCC maintainers might have a better suggestion. I'd guess we are not the only ones who bumped into this; glibc probably did that a long time ago.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |