Date:	Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:18:36 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Unnormals???
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10003201737120.25247-100000@acp3bf>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000320191718.27773B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:

> Real indefinite, once present in a variable, or found in
> an FPU register, is treated exactly like all other QNaNs. I.e. it only has
> a different origin, but no different behaviour. 

That is true.  However, my concern about the indefinite is that, in real 
life, a user will see only that special type of a NaN, almost exclusively.

- Raw text -