Date:	Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:19:27 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
cc:	DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Unnormals???
In-Reply-To:	<200003201649.RAA27339@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000320191858.27773C-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> Perhaps the n-char-sequence shall be used to show the bitpattern of
> the NaN? Then we would see the sign if we knew what bit it is...

This is also a possibility I won't object.

- Raw text -