Date:	Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:42:36 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Unnormals???
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10003151806320.21378-100000@acp3bf>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000316114227.3117D-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:

> Unnormalized numbers other than the denormals
> shouldn't usually need any special treatment at all.  If memory serves,
> they're auto-normalized on reading into the FPU.

Not true.  You can easily write a simple test program which will show
the facts.

- Raw text -