From:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-ID:	<B0000116929@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 14:02:04 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: make depend
References:	<Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10001241001590 DOT 112552-100000 AT ieva01 DOT lanet DOT lv>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000124131200.11358E-100000@is>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On 24 Jan 00, at 13:15, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Andris Pavenis wrote:
> 
> > And if we are using 
> > '-imacros %sdjgpp.ver' hack already in building specs then it should work
> > at build time. I had problems with gcc-2.96 snapshots and earlier hack.
> 
> Ah, okay.  So the problems with 2.96 were actually during build time, 
> not in using -macros after the compiler is installed, right? 

Last times I tried to build gcc-2.96 snapshots for DJGPP (more than a 
month ago) I got stuck in stage 2 as garbage collector seems to broken 
for DJGPP (as result 1st stage compiler is not able to compile large files 
like gcc/cccp.c). So I didn't check whether this hack works after 
installation. 

However I'm rather often leaving bootstrapping CVS version og gcc-
2.96 in Linux (not much to do. I'm simply leaving script when going 
away). Tests in Linux show that -imacros ../include/foo.h works in 
Linux with gcc-2.96 (of course if I replace foo.h with real name)

> 
> > Perhaps I'll install it in lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/$version anyway.
> 
> Okay.
> 
> > Only reason why to have it in $DJDIR/lib is to make it removal
> > from dependencies more easy. Perhaps I can move it and place it in
> > $DJDIR/lib myself (in gcc295Xb.zip).
> 
> You can do this as well, it shouldn't do any harm as long as the GCC 
> distribution is the only one which comes with that file.
> 

Andris

- Raw text -