Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2000 09:44:52 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: make depend
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.A41.4.05.10001211017240.58004-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000123094413.26609C@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> If we'll put djgpp.ver in the same directory where xgcc.exe is
> located it should work better

I don't see anything wrong with having that file in any directory
under %DJDIR%.

But I don't understand what does ``where xgcc.exe is located'' means.
There's no xgcc.exe in the binary distribution, AFAIK xgcc exists only
while GCC is being built.  So in what directory should we put this
file for the best results?

> About name: I think it's better to avoid using extension .h there.
> 	What name do You suggest?

If there are good reasons to avoid a .h extension, then I don't have
anything against djgpp.ver.  Why do you suggest to avoid the .h
extension?

> Also with time we could add it to DJDEV (lib/djgpp.ver)

That's what I had in mind.  Perhaps we will need to update djdev203
anyway (see the problems with djgpp.djl), in which case I'd like to
add this file there already.  Do you see any reasons why this might be
a bad idea?

- Raw text -